Current Externally-funded Projects

The LLECJ Project: Law and Language at the European Court of Justice

Funding Body: The European Research Council (ERC) [EU Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) – project number 313353]

The ‘Law and Language at the European Court of Justice’ Project (LLECJ Project) aims to elaborate a new understanding of the development of EU law by examining the process behind the production of the multilingual jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ).  By analysing the relationship between law, language and translation in the jurisprudence of the ECJ, using methodological tools borrowed from fields outside of law, the LLECJ project aims to introduce a new facet to the current thinking on the development of the EU legal order.  The project is divided into three interconnected subprojects:

  1. Investigating the nature of a multilingual legal system by analysing the process behind the production of the ECJ’s multilingual jurisprudence;
  2. Exploring the role that language may play in the development of a de facto ‘precedent’ in ECJ judgments;
  3. Exploring the role of the Advocate General at the ECJ and the processes behind the production of opinions in the mother tongue of the Advocate General and in other languages

More details about this project, including details of events and outputs, can be found on the project website.

Previous Externally-funded Projects

The EUCLCORP Project: The European Case Law Corpus (ERC H2020)

Funding Body: The European Research Council (ERC) [EU Horizon 2020 – project number 692914]

Dates: 01/07/2016 – 31/12/2017

The EU Case Law Corpus (EUCLCORP) Project involved the creation of a standardised, multidimensional and multilingual corpus containing all judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) and judgments delivered by contstitutional and/or supreme courts of (currently) seven EU member states.

The project aimed to address the gap in resources available for analysing EU case law by providing a resource that allows users of law to investigate in a systematic way:

  • The history of the meaning(s) of a particular legal term
  • In the case of an ambiguous term – the sense in which it is most frequently used
  • The influence of national legal languages on EU case law (and vice versa)
  • The impact of translation on the development of EU case law

By adding to the big data currently available in legal databases, EUCLCORP aimed to contribute to a better understanding of EU law and of the Europeanisation of law as well as improved administration of justice.

The EUCLCORP project was delivered on schedule and under budget on the 31st of December 2017.  More details about this project can be found on the project website.


Seminar Series on Developmental Social Neuroscience, Ethics and the Law: Challenges to Legal Perspectives in the UK and Europe (ESRC)

Funding Body: The Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)

Dates: 2011-2012

Advances in developmental neuroscience have shown that ‘adult-like’ brain systems – i.e. those required for sophisticated appraisal of one’s actions and potential consequences of such actions – do not become fully mature until later stages of adolescence. Furthermore, such maturity can be affected by adversity and injury. In the long term this can mean the compromising of key neurological functions – in particular, the capacity to consider complex decisions relating to one’s own welfare and real engagement in society. Both adversity and injury have been shown to be common in children who offend (and re-offend). However, studies have shown that children who receive adequate treatment for such injuries or illnesses at an early stage in their development may deal more successfully with social integration at a later stage – such as children provided with rehabilitation after brain injury may avoid violent offending.

This one-year seminar series brought together specialists from the fields of neuroscience, law and policymaking, to address questions relating to brain development, neurological injury and the law – sharing advances in the neuroscience of developmental conditions: exploring the legal implications of such advances at national and EU levels and considering how regulation of neuroscience could be improved at those levels.

Programme of Events

5 seminars were held in total:

  • Seminar 1 (London): leading neuroscientists and clinicians presented an overview of recent advances in understanding brain development, consequences of adversity and injury, and status of interventions.
  • Seminar 2 (London): this seminar was led by lawyers who explored the implications of such advances for the law – particularly regarding the justice system in general and criminal and medico-legal cases in particular.
  • Seminar 3 (Brussels): a workshop which brought together neuroscientists, lawyers and policymakers based in Europe – including civil servants from the European Commission, Council and Parliament – to develop links and consider European regulation in this field.
  • Seminar 4 (UK Houses of Parliament): this seminar was jointly hosted by the Parliamentary Office for Science and Technology (POST). Key speakers from previous seminars presented findings from those seminars to policymakers and politicians across all-party groups.
  • Seminar 5 (Cardiff and Exeter): two core workshops to oversee development of position papers for The Office of the Children’s Commissioner (OCC) and the Barrow-Cadbury Trust (BCT), development of web resources and production of materials for POST.

Selected outcomes and further information

The Barrow Cadbury Trust commissioned a policy review, which was launched by the All Party Parliamentary Group on Penal Affairs in the UK Parliament in December 2012.  The review, ‘Repairing Shattered Lives‘ is available here.

The Office of the Children’s Commissioner commissioned a review, which was launched in October 2012. This review has been disseminated widely and in particular to stakeholders such as the Youth Justice Board and National Offender Management Services, to help such stakeholders achieve an improved understanding of how to identify children at risk and how best to provide for their education/health needs.  The review, ‘Nobody Made the Connection‘ is available here.

A web resource has been created containing details of the seminar series, key themes, resources and links as well as media coverage of our research. This resource is intended to be a ‘hub’ for the networks developed though the seminar series to allow for further collaboration in this area.  The resource is accessible here.